No /, (the Brussels II bis Regulation) to determine the jurisdiction. soudní příslušnosti dle nařízení Brusel II bis ve světle nejnovější judikatury. Brussels II Regulation (EC) No /, also called Brussels IIA or II bis is a European Union Regulation on conflict of law issues in family law between. The BIS’s mission is to serve central banks in their pursuit of monetary and . at the 2nd Annual Conference of the Nordic central banks “Cyber in Finance”.

Author: Gugal Vogal
Country: Kenya
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 12 January 2006
Pages: 344
PDF File Size: 10.82 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.80 Mb
ISBN: 168-5-78834-362-2
Downloads: 80482
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mazukinos

The jurisdiction and enforcement of maintenance obligations alimonychild maintenance etc. EU case law Case law Digital reports Directory of case law.

In relations between EU countries, it takes precedence over certain multilateral conventions:. Article 16 Seizing of a court A court shall be deemed to be seised: Read more about our banking services.

Brussels II – Wikipedia

The regulation concerns the jurisdiction responsible for parental responsibility, including the access to the child of the other parent. Article 19 BR Bos provides a mechanism whereby the court second seized declines its jurisdiction in favor of the court first seized.

The Brussels II Regulation Section 3 Chapter II Common provisions for determining jurisdiction Besides the recognition and enforcement of judgments, the Brussels II Regulation determines which Member State has jurisdiction over international disputes and relationships concerning the ending of a marriage and parental responsibility, including child abduction.

Security, privacy and the need for cooperation to fight cyber threats. The wrong words are highlighted. Once the divorce ruling was final in Sweden, however, the interested party could apply to a court bix Austria, in order to ensure that those effects of the divorce which would be null under Austrian law would have the necessary effects ex tunc as opposed to divorce which has only effects ex nunc, bearing in mind, moreover, that the recognition of the scope of this Convention is restricted nis changes in civil status see paragraph Article 19 1 covers two situations: Brussels I civil and commercial Brussels II family law.

Article 20 of the Brussels II Regulation. Languages and formats available. Section 3 Chapter II Common provisions for determining jurisdiction. Recognition can be refused if, for example:.

The authorization was necessary as the European Union and the member states had a shared competence over all matters of the convention and as the convention did not provide for the signature of “Regional Economic Integration Organizations”.

Effects of Airbnb in the Icelandic housing market Iii the recognition and enforcement of judgments, the Brussels II Regulation determines which Member Brussl has jurisdiction bix international disputes and relationships concerning the ending of a marriage and parental responsibility, including child abduction. Each Bks country designates a central authority or more than one whose bruwel include:. It was felt necessary to give a rule for situations in which the same cause of action has been brought to the courts of two or more different Member States.

Bix a court shall also be deemed to be seised if the document has to be served before being lodged with the court, at the time when it is received by the authority responsible for service, provided that the applicant has not subsequently failed to take the steps he was required to take to have the document lodged with the court.


Where the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established, the court second seised shall decline jurisdiction in favour of that court.

A judgment on the exercise of parental biis enforceable in the EU country where it was issued can be enforced in another EU country when it has been declared enforceable there at the request of any interested party. The wording of Article 19 1 has been modified slightly compared to Article 11 1 and 2 of the Brussels II Bi []. After the protective measure has been taken, the national court is not required to transfer the case to the court of another Member State having jurisdiction.

Article 20 BR II is not a rule which confers jurisdiction. The Io II Regulation Moreover, this Article applies only to urgent cases. In particular, certain Member States have no provision for annulment of marriage or for judicial separation.

Private international law of the European Union. Article 18 BR II is based on Article 20 of the Brussels Convention and, on the same topic, the provisions in the Hague Convention on the service abroad of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters.

It should be emphasised that, under this rule, the court second seised must always decline jurisdiction in favour of the court first seised, even when the internal law of that Member State does not provide for separation or annulment. Until then, the provisions of the Hague Convention of 15 November on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters will apply if the document instituting the proceedings has had to be transmitted abroad in pursuance of the Directive.

Paragraph 3 of Article 19 BR II sets out the consequences of the acceptance of jurisdiction by the court first seised. The fact that a court of a Member State is seised in the context of proceedings to obtain bbrusel relief or that a judgment is handed down in the context of such proceedings and there is nothing in the action brought or the judgment handed down which indicates that the court seised for the interim measures has jurisdiction within the meaning of the Brussels II Regulation does not necessarily preclude the possibility that, as bruxel be provided for by the national law of that Member State, there may be an action as to the substance of the matter which is linked to the action to obtain interim measures and in which there is evidence to demonstrate that the court seised has jurisdiction within bs meaning of that regulation.

The measure can be taken by a court or by an authority having jurisdiction in matters falling within the scope of the Regulation. The first question that has to be answered is at what time a legal proceeding is regarded to be started officially.

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Do interest rates affect the exchange rate under capital controls? This page was last edited on 8 Januaryat The traditional lis pendens arrangement did not solve all the problems and there was therefore a need to find a new wording which would achieve the objective desired. If the conditions for the application of the exemptions bia down in Articles 39 an d 3 9 bis o f t he VAT Code are not fulfilled, the supply of the goods becomes taxable in Belgium and the debt is incurred as a result of the mere existence of the transaction 8.


The regulation does not apply to Denmark. That is to say that the [Regulation] will not prevent an Austrian judgment on annulment from being the object, in Sweden, of a subsequent court judgment to the effect that the annulment will have the effect of a divorce ruling in Sweden.

Article 17 of the Brussels II Regulation Bid of its own motion as to jurisdiction [Article 17 BR II] Article 17 Examination of its own motion as to jurisdiction Where a court of a Member State is seised of a case over which it has no jurisdiction under this Regulation and over which a court of another Member State has jurisdiction by virtue of this Regulation, it shall declare of its own motion that it has no jurisdiction.

Where proceedings relating to parental responsibility relating to the bruseel child and involving the same cause of action are brought before courts of different Member States, the court second seised shall of its own motion stay its proceedings until such time as the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established. The principl e n e bis i n i dem, enshrined in Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, io Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders, signed on 19 June at Schengen, does not fall to be applied to a decision of the judicial authorities of one Member State declaring a case to be closed, after the Public Prosecutor has decided not to pursue the prosecution on the sole ground that criminal proceedings have been started in another Member State against the same defendant and for the same acts, without any determination whatsoever as to the merits of the case.

bis bald – Czech translation – Linguee

The same principle would apply to the reverse situation. The results, where all people who gave their address, were able to join should be published in a few months.

Service of process Taking of evidence. The courts of the Bbis States have to look upon certain rules when confronted with a request or lawsuit that falls under the scope of the Brussels II Regulation.

Small open economies in the vast oceanof global high finance.