Francis Fukuyama. Sfarsitul istoriei si ultimul om. Pe masura ce tumultuosul secol XX se indreapta plin de spaima spre sfarsitul sau prabusirea comunismului. Recenzia 1. Fukuyama argumenteaza ca democratia liberala de sorginte occidentala nu inseamna altceva decat sfarsitul unei evolutii. IN WATCHING the flow of events over the past decade or so, it is hard to avoid the feeling that something very fundamental has happened in world history.
|Published (Last):||11 May 2014|
|PDF File Size:||16.64 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.67 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
But surely, the class issue has actually been successfully resolved in the West. Fukuyama is known for his book The End of History and the Last Manwhich argued that the worldwide spread of liberal democracies and free market capitalism of the West and its lifestyle may signal the end point of humanity’s sociocultural evolution and become the final form of human government. rukuyama
Francis Fukuyama – Wikipedia
He traces what we know–and more franfis don’t know–about how to transfer functioning public institutions to developing countries in ways that will leave something of permanent benefit to the citizens of the countries concerned. Fukuyama received his Bachelor of Arts degree in classics from Cornell Universitywhere he studied political philosophy under Allan Bloom.
This led to a drive for pure territorial aggrandizement in the latter half of the century and played no small role in causing the Great War. Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order.
Aceasta recunostere era insuficienta pentru prima categorie si inexistenta pentru a doua. Fukuhama ruins of the Sfarsitkl chancellery as well as the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed this ideology on the level of consciousness as well as materially, and all of the pro-fascist movements spawned by the German and Japanese examples like the Peronist movement in Argentina or Subhas Chandra Bose’s Indian National Army withered after the war.
Sociologul care i d replica lui Fukuyama este Samuel Huntington, care, fu,uyama careta ocul civilizaiilordemonstreaz falsitatea teoriei anterioare prin afirmarea fragmentaritii lumii contemporane n 7 sau 8 blocuri civilizaionale.
Representing a wide range of perspectives, the writers gathered here place the current foreign-policy predicament As a result of the receding of the class issue, the appeal of communism in the developed Western world, it is safe to say, is lower today than any time since the end of the First World War. ChicagoIllinoisU.
Obviously fascist ideologies cannot be universalistic in the sense of Marxism or liberalism, but the structure of the doctrine can be transferred from country to country. He traces the strains of Wilsonism that have now merged into an adventurous and hazardous foreign policy, particularly as described by William Kristol, Francis Fukuyama, Max Boot, and Paul Wolfowitz, among others.
Gorbachev’s repeated assertions that he is doing no more than trying to restore the original meaning of Leninism are themselves a kind of Orwellian doublespeak.
Francis Fukuyama America la rascruce – Democratia, puterea si mostenirea neoconservatoare. Raspunsul dat de Fukuyama este unul afirmativ, avand la baza o dubla motivatie- una franccis de aspecte economice si cealalta de lupta pentru recunoastere.
For the world at that point would be divided between a part that was historical and a part that was post-historical. Sociologii filozofi vorbesc despre preeminana democraiei liberale, wfarsitul culturali despre postmodernism, iar istooriei, mai pragmatici, aduc drept argument datele demografice pentru un secol XXI plin de conflicte. De asemenea, Huntington contracareaz ideea de sat planetar, de globalizare i de uniformizare prin argumentul final c rspndirea tehnologic i a bunurilor occidentale nu impun automat i valorile occidentale.
Yet while the emptiness at the core of liberalism is most certainly a defect in the ideology – indeed, a flaw that one does not need the perspective of religion to recognize[ 15 ] – it sfarsitup not at all clear that it is remediable through politics. The Wall Street Journal kstoriei of deterministic materialism habitually points to the stunning economic success of Asia in the past few decades as evidence of the viability of free market economics, with the implication that all societies would see similar development were they simply to allow their populations to pursue their material self-interest freely.
Fukuyama predicted the eventual global triumph of political and economic liberalism:.
Leffler and Jeffrey W. The choices of leisure over income, or of the militaristic life of the Spartan hoplite over the wealth of the Athenian trader, or even the ascetic life of the early capitalist entrepreneur over that of a traditional leisured aristocrat, cannot possibly be explained by the impersonal working of material forces, but come preeminently out of the sphere of consciousness – what we have labeled here broadly as ideology.
At an annual dinner of the American Enterprise Institute in FebruaryDick Cheney and Charles Krauthammer declared the beginning of a unipolar era under American hegemony.
The Soviet Union could in no way be described as a liberal or democratic country now, nor do I think that it is terribly likely that perestroika will succeed such that the label will be thinkable any time in the near future. The struggle for recognition provides us with insight into the nature of international politics.
Gorbachev were ousted from the Kremlin or a new Ayatollah proclaimed the millennium from a desolate Middle Eastern capital, these same commentators would scramble to announce the rebirth of a new era of conflict. Why did this happen? Wikiquote has quotations related to: In acest volum se evidentiaza doua incercari de a prezenta o Istorie Universala; in prima parte se stabileste necesitatea invocarii posibilitatii unei asemenea Istorii, in timp ce in partea a doua se propune un raspuns, fiind folosita stiinta moderna ca mecanism de reglare petru a explicita directionalitatea sau coerenta istoriei.
Moreover, it is hard to be too sanguine about the chances for success of Gorbachev’s proposed reforms, either in the sphere of economics or politics. According to Fukuyama, since the French Revolutiondemocracy has repeatedly proven to be a fundamentally better system ethically, politically, economically than any of the alternatives.
International life for the part of the world that has reached the end of history is far more preoccupied with economics than with politics or strategy.