This manual, the infamous KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation, dated July , is the source of much of the material in the second manual. KUBARK. Its purpose is to provide guidelines for KUBARK interrogation, and particularly the counterintelligence interrogation of resistant sources. This page report, classified Secret, was drafted in July as a comprehensive guide for training interrogators in the art of obtaining.

Author: Fenrisar Dubei
Country: Bulgaria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 2 November 2009
Pages: 161
PDF File Size: 10.44 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.68 Mb
ISBN: 525-9-51073-712-1
Downloads: 19772
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shakat

Threats and threatening gestures, table-pounding, pouncing on evasions or lies, and any similarly authoritative tactics will only awaken in such a subject his old anxieties and habitual defense mechanisms.

He has stated the fact, there is nothing to qualify.

For example, the [approx. But sound interrogation nevertheless rests upon a knowledge of the subject matter and on certain broad principles, chiefly psychological, which are not hard to understand.

In the name of defending democracy, the manuals advocate profoundly undemocratic methods. All non-Communist services are bothered at times by disgruntled exinterrogatees who press demands and threaten or take hostile action if the demands are not satisfied.

If in the opinion counteriintelligence the interrogator a totally resistant source has the skill and determination to withstand any con-coercive method or combination of methods, it is better to avoid them completely.

Is there a torture manual?

When interrogated, the exceptions are likely to make demands for money, resettlement aid, and other favors — demands that are completely out of proportion to the value of their contributions. He has merely learned how to proceed indirectly if necessary. As interrogation sources, optimistic characters respond best to a kindly, parental approach. But the successful establishment of rapport will tend to eliminate innocent blocks, or at least to keep them to a minimum.

Other applicable hypotheses are that fear increases the affiliative needs of first-born and only children much more than countegintelligence of the later-born. The greedy and demanding character is subject to kubaark frequent depressions.

TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE ยป CIA, KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation Manual

They are secretive and disinclined to confide in anyone else their plans kuark plots, which frequently concern the overthrow of some form of authority.


Persons suffering from severe mental illness will show major distortions, delusions, or hallucinations and will usually give bizarre explanations for their behavior. Defectors can usually be interrogated unilaterally, at least for a time.

He might even go back to your Soviet case officer and say that you haven’t returned because you agreed to stay here and work for us. A counterintelligence interrogation consists of four parts: These in turn produce unnatural pauses, meaningless sounds designed to give the speaker more time, or other interruptions.

Such comments as, “That must have been a bad time for you and your family,” or “Yes, I can see why you were angry,” or “It sounds exciting” are sufficiently innocuous not to distract the subject, yet provide adequate evidence of sympathetic interest. Only when these have been established and understood does it become possible to plan realistically. George rated it liked it Mar 27, With this common understanding established, the interrogation can move on to impersonal matters and will not later be thwarted or interrupted — or at least not as often — by irrelevant answers designed not to provide facts but to prove that the interrogatee is a respectable member of the human race.

The interrogator must know exactly what he wants to know.

U.S. Army and CIA interrogation manuals

In some interrogatees the ego-demands, the counterintelligencd to save face, are so intertwined with preservation of the cover story that calling the man a liar will merely intensify resistance. Not the reaction but a failure to report it would be evidence of a lack of professionalism. As was noted at the beginning of this section, the successful interrogation of a strongly resistant source ordinarily involves two key processes: B is later brought into the outer office by a guard and placed where he can hear, though not too clearly.

Planning for interrogation is more important than the specifics of the plan. Paperbackpages.

When the claim is ignored or denied, counterintelligencee exceptions become rebellious, as adolescents often do. The list seems almost endless – a professional manner, forcefulness, understanding counterintellifence sympathy, breadth of general knowledge, area knowledge, “a practical knowledge of psychology”, skill in the tricks of the trade, alertness, perseverance, integrity, discretion, patience, a high I.


Questioning suspects immediately, on a flimsy factual basis, will usually cause waste of time, not save it. The walk-in may be asked to identify all relatives and friends in the area, or even the country, in which PBPRIME asylum is first requested.

He is usually a tightwad who saves everything, has a strong sense of propriety, and is punctual and tidy. The legality of detaining and questioning a person, and of the methods employed, [approx.

Apr 22, Cristian rated it it was ok Shelves: The end of an interrogation should be planned before questioning starts.

The poorest interrogations are those that trail off into an inconclusive nothingness. Thanks for telling us about the problem. The initially resistant subject may become cooperative because of a partial identification with the interrogator and his interests, or the source may make such an identification because of his cooperation.

Find kkbark books at transcend. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter.

Democracy, Intervention, and Human Rights. At any rate, the purpose of the reconnaissance is to provide a quick testing of the assumption and, more importantly, to probe the causes, extent, and intensity of resistance. Confrontation of two or more suspects with each other in order to produce recriminations or admissions is especially dangerous if not preceded by separate interrogation sessions which have evoked compliance from one of the interrogatees, or at least significant admissions involving both.

Some treatises on interrogation are emphatic about the value of arranging the lighting so that its source is behind the interrogator and glares directly at the subject.

Read more Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: